which propellor
Moderators: John@sos, charlesp, Charles uk, RickUK, Petergalileo
- Rob Ripley
- Posts: 442
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 11:38 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
which propellor
102 power unit, 40+ leg and gearbox (exhaust tapered to fit)... which propellor?
- 40TPI
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 7:08 pm
- Location: North Buckinghamshire, 110 miles south of Yorkshire, England.
Re: which propellor
Essentially you have, with that setup, a direct drive "Century" since the 40+ and (Silver)Century direct drive models share the same 35:10 ratio gearbox. The prop for this gearbox, when driven by 102cc, is the 5 blade 9inch hydrofan part # 100/1409. Other props could possibly be used however that prop hub shape matches the outline of the gear casing to minimise drag.
Seems a lot of work to reduce a 102 exhaust to fit the 40+ pump housing . Wouldn't it have been a lot easier to have simply used the larger Silver or Century pump housing #100/1358 that matches that gearbox?
Peter
Seems a lot of work to reduce a 102 exhaust to fit the 40+ pump housing . Wouldn't it have been a lot easier to have simply used the larger Silver or Century pump housing #100/1358 that matches that gearbox?
Peter
- Charles uk
- Posts: 4972
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:38 pm
- Location: Maidenhead Berks UK
Re: which propellor
Rob if you can find yourself a Century 100 LLS or W or a Silver Century S or WS you will get the right Prop, exhaust tube & a water pump housing that will save you messing with the 102 exhaust tube & a water delivery pipe that was made for the job.
You don't have to run water back into the exhaust tube but it will quieten it down a little if you do.
The 3.5 : 1 lower unit is not as pretty or sleek as the 102 2.5 : 1 gear box don't do it!
You don't have to run water back into the exhaust tube but it will quieten it down a little if you do.
The 3.5 : 1 lower unit is not as pretty or sleek as the 102 2.5 : 1 gear box don't do it!
Make it idiot proof and someone will make a better idiot.
- Rob Ripley
- Posts: 442
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 11:38 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Re: which propellor
... 'You don't have to run water back into the exhaust tube but it will quieten it down a little if you do.'
Too late - it's done, water into the exhaust etc. Can't tell the difference in the sound with my standard 102 and C100.
Too late - it's done, water into the exhaust etc. Can't tell the difference in the sound with my standard 102 and C100.
- Rob Ripley
- Posts: 442
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 11:38 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Re: which propellor
...' eems a lot of work to reduce a 102 exhaust to fit the 40+ pump housing . Wouldn't it have been a lot easier to have simply used the larger Silver or Century pump housing #100/1358 that matches that gearbox? '
Well, I already have a 102 and a C100 and some 40+'s. This combination looks very smart, reminds me of the tapered exhausts of the early Seagulls.
Well, I already have a 102 and a C100 and some 40+'s. This combination looks very smart, reminds me of the tapered exhausts of the early Seagulls.
Re: which propellor
How about a photo then ...id like to see it?
- Rob Ripley
- Posts: 442
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 11:38 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Re: which propellor
I just emailed a note to Niander about the tapered exhaust.
Re: which propellor
Yes got it looks ok that exhaust 

- Rob Ripley
- Posts: 442
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 11:38 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Re: which propellor
My other 102 developed a terminal case of gearbox failure and as I just happened to have a complete 40+ spare leg and gearbox .... It fits, all I have to do is find some way of locating the bottom end of the 102 pipe to the 40+ small exhaust stub. And it's an easy/better solution to trying to fit the 'S' section of the water pump connection. Sound a bit LOUD when I fire it up!
Re: which propellor
Can you not look / feel up the exhaust outlet t get it int ole?