Page 1 of 1

Little Forty ?

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2018 7:02 pm
by cookie1
Good evening

I have acquired LS 20623 . What's the general opinion , Forty or Little Forty ?

cheers

Re: Little Forty ?

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2018 7:30 pm
by tambikeboy
Super 40 :lol:

Re: Little Forty ?

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2018 9:22 pm
by Oyster 49
super forty plus!

Re: Little Forty ?

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2018 10:22 pm
by cookie1
Any advance on Super Forty Plus :P

Re: Little Forty ?

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2018 10:48 pm
by Oyster 49
That then evolved into the forty minus, and forty plus, odd when you consider they were not the original 40cc :shock:

Re: Little Forty ?

Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2018 6:33 am
by Gannet
Hi John,

Well done on acquiring another engine from the Early Forty Series. I have added it to the register.
I would be interested what tank is fitted (ie has it the 7/16 or the 3/4 corner rads) and whether the choke flap has a air hole in the middle and also whether the carb bowl has a drain hole near the top. Has it got the black plastic fuel pipe? Sorry for these questions, but it can all add to our knowledge.

I am not very good ar remembering their model names as designated by the sales side of BS. Super Forty Plus, as Adrian suggests sound right.

The letter prefixes on the other hand are, I believe, very descriptive in respect of the steady development of these engines. I have proposed previously that LS stood for Long(er) Stroke, which is the fundamental design difference to the FVP (Forty Villiers Plus).
As has been mentioned the next development were the SJM/SJP models. The fundamental desigh change over the LS was that the cooling water was sealed from the aluminium crankcase by the design of the water jacket. I have proposed that the SJM/SJP prefix stood for Sealed Jacket Minus/Plus.

Jeremy

Re: Little Forty ?

Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2018 9:46 pm
by cookie1
Hi Jeremy

Thanks for the info , I'll have a look for the details you're asking for and maybe even get some pics ! I'll settle for Super Forty Plus , sounds great !

cheers

John

Re: Little Forty ?

Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2018 7:09 pm
by cookie1
A few pics

Re: Little Forty ?

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2018 9:46 pm
by Gannet
Thank you John for the photos.
It looks a nice complete correct LS.
I think the tank is the later c7/16" corner rad version.
I note that the choke flap does not have the central air hole. I am not able to see whether the float chamber has a drainage hole or not. Could you tell me?
The fuel pipe is the black plastic version.
The tiller appears to be the correct 10" long version complete with the correct grip.

These features are helping us to establish when these changes occurred.

Jeremy














2

Re: Little Forty ?

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2018 9:56 pm
by cookie1
Hi Jeremy

Thanks , its good to know it looks original . Forgot to say it does have the wee hole on the float chamber .

cheers

John

Re: Little Forty ?

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 1:07 pm
by Charles uk
http://www.britishseagullparts.com/images/LS-model.jpg

This would tend to make Oysters statement 100 % accurate!

Thanks britishseagullparts, I've spoken to the owner of this drawing & have his permission use it.

This clearly illustrates some of the development path of the 40 series & what was fitted to this motor at the time this parts list was printed.

Re: Little Forty ?

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 10:18 pm
by cookie1
Thanks Charles , thats interesting and a correct ID the LS