Wartime piston

Having problems with a Seagull? - ask an expert here

Moderators: John@sos, charlesp, Charles uk, RickUK, Petergalileo

User avatar
JERSEYMAN
Posts: 665
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 2:47 pm
Location: Jersey, Channel Islands

Re: Wartime piston

Post by JERSEYMAN »

I've got to say I've never seen a floating gudgeon pin without ally ends and if I remember right, the short water jacket barrels had bridged ports to keep the motor from self destructing.
Salvtecmarine
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 8:26 pm
Location:

Re: Wartime piston

Post by Salvtecmarine »

My engine did not have end caps on the pin, what it does have is, rounded polished ends, and from what I have seen on my other engine is it is identical, there are no pads on that piston / pin, if there were indeed pads fitted, were these a later addition or just omitted in later builds as they were not required?

As I have said, the bore is perfect with no scoring at all, the pin is polished at the end, which to me would say it has contacted the bore, I have not had a close look , but I will when I get home, but could there be wear pads pressed into the ends of the pin?
User avatar
JERSEYMAN
Posts: 665
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 2:47 pm
Location: Jersey, Channel Islands

Re: Wartime piston

Post by JERSEYMAN »

A photo would be great, all the gudgeon pins I have ever seen on Seagulls have been hollow and with the early ones, ally pads pushed in the ends.

That's not to say solid pins don't exist, with seagulls anything is possible, that's why a photo would be great.
User avatar
jerseydave69
Posts: 65
Joined: Mon May 25, 2015 8:53 pm
Location:

Re: Wartime piston

Post by jerseydave69 »

Salvtecmarine wrote:Hello Jon

Thanks for the reply, put my mind at rest.
I checked the piston and it is the original hepolite, the big end has the hollow end cap on it too, it has the short water jacket and the piston and cylinder are in quite perfect condition for an engine built in the 40's,
Engine number Sdp8969

I just want to get it to an original working state, it has taken a few years to get its scars and scrapes, only things missing are carb, flywheel cover plate and bayonet cap for the tank.

Thanks
What I find interesting is , I have SDP8988 ! Mine doesn't have the circlips either, but has the aluminium looking plugs at either end
headdownarseup
Posts: 2484
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 2:26 pm
Location: bristol

Re: Wartime piston

Post by headdownarseup »

Perhaps these pics might help.

Although these originally came out of a model D, going by the SD's SDP's and countless other "older" 102's i've stripped/rebuilt, these would appear to be the standard/correct parts for something built before (approx.) 1952/3. After this date, (possibly quite a bit later) the crankshaft looks to have been re-designed into the solid big end type with re-designed hollow gudgeon pin with circlips.
If there's anything in your motor that doesn't look exactly like this, then it's probably been apart in the past.

I have a few motors that date from the early 50's that follow the same internal build spec. , but as we all know, who knows what might (or not) have been changed over the years.

Jon
Attachments
same at both ends, slightly rounded, not sure if these are a press-fit but definitely polished and different material to the pin.
same at both ends, slightly rounded, not sure if these are a press-fit but definitely polished and different material to the pin.
a lot of 102's seem to be fitted with a hepolite piston
a lot of 102's seem to be fitted with a hepolite piston
hollow big end on the crank, no writing on the con-rod.
hollow big end on the crank, no writing on the con-rod.
Salvtecmarine
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 8:26 pm
Location:

Re: Wartime piston

Post by Salvtecmarine »

Hi Jon

That's identical to mine, phew.....

I was a wee bit worried for a bit.
Thanks
User avatar
Charles uk
Posts: 4972
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:38 pm
Location: Maidenhead Berks UK

Re: Wartime piston

Post by Charles uk »

Perhaps it's time that I made a statement regarding gudgeon / wrist pin usage in the Marston / British Seagull product range.

From the first 1931 Marston Seagull until some time in the late 40's, all the range 78, 102 & the 340 cc twins had floating gudgeon pins, so that's a piston with no circlips or circlip grooves & a pin with end pads, the cylinder also had bridged transfer & exhaust ports to prevent the pin catching in the port.

These pistons should not be used in cylinders that they were not designed for, i.e. post 1950 ish, a defective SD piston can be replaced with a piston set (piston, gudgeon pin & circlips) from any of the later 102 cc models, though it will be found that the piston's transfer port deflector notch does not suit the port dimensions as well as the original.

These pins were hollow with pads inserted into each end.

After this changeover Seagull only used hollow pins with circlips & one blanked off end, this pin should only be fitted with blank end uppermost to avoid the hollow in the pin filling with lube oil & increasing the weight of the piston & possibly causing balance problems.
Make it idiot proof and someone will make a better idiot.
Adrian Dale
Posts: 758
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 7:58 am
Location: Tasmania, Australia

Re: Wartime piston

Post by Adrian Dale »

Thanks Charles, so the inference is that on my OA and also the AD and OJ, the ally end cap is missing, lost from previous rebuilds? cant recheck the OJ and SD as they are both in the UK but will pull down the OA again, couple of things to do on her any way..

Good photo of the pin with the ally insert posted by Jon above.

AJ
User avatar
Charles uk
Posts: 4972
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:38 pm
Location: Maidenhead Berks UK

Re: Wartime piston

Post by Charles uk »

I've never seen any of these pins with a pad or pads missing, but then I've only had under 40 of them in bits.

So no circlips must have pads!

On the OA undo the exhaust retaining bolts & rotate exhaust after pushing down to save gasket, on many you'll be able to see enough of the pin to check.
Make it idiot proof and someone will make a better idiot.
Horsley-Anarak
Posts: 2838
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 8:42 pm
Location: Surrey

Re: Wartime piston

Post by Horsley-Anarak »

2015-11-07 09.20.41.jpg
User avatar
Charles uk
Posts: 4972
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:38 pm
Location: Maidenhead Berks UK

Re: Wartime piston

Post by Charles uk »

I could kiss you H-A!

But Won't.
Make it idiot proof and someone will make a better idiot.
User avatar
JERSEYMAN
Posts: 665
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 2:47 pm
Location: Jersey, Channel Islands

Re: Wartime piston

Post by JERSEYMAN »

Great Pic
Adrian Dale
Posts: 758
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 7:58 am
Location: Tasmania, Australia

Re: Wartime piston

Post by Adrian Dale »

Great pic I have down loaded to my collection for future reference.. thanks AJ
Post Reply